Anti-affiliation and its cultural representations in poetic discourse: Social opposition is a model

Abstract

   The voice of the poets who belong to the poor social class expressed an anti-popular culture that rejects the policy followed in the distribution of wealth, and their expression implied a social opposition that shows the injustice of this large segment of the people, and despite the dominance of self-suffering over their poetic discourses, these poets united With their affiliation, they represented their suffering in poetic discourse, especially since most of them grew up in poor environments, and their systemic references were formed in the shadow of the cultural incubator of the impoverished class. In expressing his opposing position, the first axis formed an indirect opposition that exposed the Abbasid authority by highlighting the class differences based on the binary bliss of the elite and the misery of the public in Abbasid society. The second axis is a direct social opposition that explores the value rift that the opposition intellectual monitors and invests in its representations in poetic discourse. This pattern of antagonistic affiliation, although it did not constitute a turning towards centralism, was able to show the dark side of the Abbasid caliphate by observing these systemic defects.