Social Control Strategies and Their Relationship to Digital Moral Risk among Adolescents

Abstract

The current research aims to:

1_ Social control strategies among the general public.

2 - Digital animal risk taking in society.

3 -The correlation between social control and digital animal risk taking among children.

4 -Statistically significant differences in the Scott Kingdom between social control and animal risk taking according to digital gender (male - female) and stream (scientific - literary) in grades (fourth - sixth) in the United States.

5 -The percentage of various harms from digital animals with strategic control among the general public.

The current research identified 400 real students who were carefully selected according to the model of Steele et al. (2020). After the validity and reliability of the instruments were written, they were applied to learn how to determine the number of data.

The research reached the following results:

The sample members clearly relied on their social control, indicating that this is an active source of communication in daily social activity. It does not have diverse eyes from digital diversity—that is, control via digital media has already exceeded a number of people or the ability to integrate into it. That is, the more social control is used on an individual, the more it diversifies into multiple digital animals (a relationship with it for years). Social control is limited to a partial (negative) contribution to the prediction of digital animal risks; that is, it explains parts of the differences between multiple people, and the effect appears as a negative result, and recommendations and recommendations have been eliminated