Hypotheses in scientific research and their response to standard variables and standards: an analytical study

Abstract

The aim of the research is to define the hypothesis, their criteria, the extent of response to them and the research variables by taking a sample of the hypotheses amounting to 41 hypotheses, available in university thesis related to the specialization of information and knowledge technologies for the period from (2011-2020), and to obtain the results the researched started building a measurement system to test the hypotheses in scientific research. Based on ( power scale, reliability scale, effectiveness scale, quality including measurement using a radar, histogram measurement, using bubble shape, Pareto’s law and others present within the research ). As for the approach the adopted one was for the analytical descriptive approach as a specialized approach in implementation, and for the data collection tools, it was a direct examination and checklist and the use of Microsoft Excel, where multiple graphic curves were implemented in addition to the analysis of the results reached by the study, and among the most prominent results: There are discrepancies in paragraphs in the reality of the hypotheses response to the criteria produced in the research field ranging from 28% to 96%. As a strong point the criterion (brevity and clarity) with the average of 2.43, which is the value Daly at a high level and a percentage weigh of 81%, that the hypotheses (total proficiency) in the extent of their response to the criteria amounted to 24%, while it reached ( partial proficiency) 27%, and the incomplete hypotheses (ineffectiveness) was 49%. The overall effectiveness was 51%. The percentage of fully achieved standards was 24%, the percentage of partially achieved standards was 27%, and the percentage of completely unfulfilled standards was 49%.